Bolshevik Illegal Printing Press – Tbilisi

House at Kaspi Street 7

House at Kaspi Street 7

More on the Republic of Georgia

Bolshevik Illegal Printing Press – Tbilisi

You have to admire the work that was expended and the organisation needed to construct the room and infrastructure for the illegal printing press that the Tbilisi (Tiflis) branch of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (which, after the October Revolution of 1917, eventually became the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolshevik)) created in the first years of the 20th century.

There’s a number of things to admire about this project that was in revolutionary use between November 1903 and April 1906.

First it was obviously a well thought through and planned project. The Georgian revolutionaries needed a printing press, they needed it well hidden from the Okhrana – the Tsarist ‘secret’ police – and they needed it to be open enough to allow the constant comings and goings that would be necessary for the printing and distribution of thousands of leaflets and pamphlets needed to spread the word of the young, revolutionary Marxist organisation in Georgia.

One remarkably bold enterprise of the Caucasian Union of the R.S.D.L.P., and an outstanding example of the Bolshevik technique of underground work, was the Avlabar secret printing press, which functioned in Tiflis from November 1903 to April 1906. On this press were printed Lenin’s ‘The Revolutionary Democratic Dictatorship of the Proletariat and the Peasantry’ and ‘To the Rural Poor’, Stalin’s ‘Briefly About the Disagreements in the Party’, ‘Two Clashes’ and other pamphlets, the Party program and rules, and scores of leaflets, many of which were written by Stalin. On it, too, were printed the newspapers Proletariatis Brdzola (The Proletarian Struggle) and Proletariaiis Brdzolis Purtseli (Herald of the Proletarian Struggle). Books, pamphlets, newspapers and leaflets were published in three languages and were printed in several thousands of copies.

A decisive role in the defence of the principles of Bolshevism in the Caucasus and in the propagation and development of Lenin’s ideas was played by the newspaper Proletariatis Brdzola, edited by Stalin, the organ of the Caucasian Union of the R.S.D.L.P. and a worthy successor of Brdzola. For its size and its quality as a Bolshevik newspaper, Proletariatis Brdzola was second only to Proletary, the Central Organ of the Party, edited by Lenin. Practically every issue carried articles by Lenin, reprinted from the Proletary. Many highly important articles were written by Stalin. In them he stands forth as a talented controversialist, eminent Party writer and theoretician, political leader of the proletariat, and faithful follower of Lenin. In his articles and pamphlets, Stalin worked out a number of theoretical and political problems. He disclosed the ideological fallacies of the anti-Bolshevik trends and factions, their opportunism and treachery. Every blow at the enemy struck with telling effect. Lenin paid glowing tribute to Proletariotis Brdzola, to its Marxian consistency and high literary merit.

(Joseph Stalin – a short biography, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1949, pp20-21.)

Second it needed meticulous organisation, the involvement of many people with different skills and abilities and – perhaps most important of all – a revolutionary unity and confidence which kept the real intention of the project away from an all pervasive and vicious secret police known to depend upon traitors, collaborators and agent-provocateurs to achieve their aims. And that’s just for the building of the structure.

There’s no way that the press could have been installed after the construction of the building itself – a large house that would have been on the edge of the town of Tiflis (now Tbilisi). The very complicated nature of access and also the size and location of the room with the printing press (as well as the printing press itself) meant that the space had to have been excavated under the cover of constructing the building’s cellar.

The extra work needed for the illegal aspects of the construction site would have needed to be monitored carefully. The building workers were almost building two buildings under the pretence of one but they would have had to have completed the work in the normal time it would have taken to construct one such house – otherwise people would have started to ask questions and suspicion would have been aroused, especially in a predominantly peasant society.

Third, there would have been the need for an not inconsiderable amount of money for such a large and complicated project – as well as a state of the art lithographic printing press, plus all the paper and materials needed once in operation. We must remember that we are here talking about industrial workers who were barely earning enough to feed themselves and their families. The finances for such a major enterprise would have never have been available without the introduction of finances from other sources. Banks had those finances and they assisted in the development of the revolutionary movement by contributing to the coffers by way of the intermediaries, Comrades Kamo (Simon Petrosian, whose bones you might walk over – between the fountain and the Pushkin bust – on the way to the Tourist Information Centre in Pushkin Park) and Koba (who used to share a room with VI Lenin in Red Square, Moscow, but who now has a niche in the wall of the Kremlin.

An idea of the complex project

Plan of the project

Plan of the project

As can be seen by the plan above there was no direct access to the room of the press from the house. Looking at the diagram it would seem to me that much of the construction of the vaulted room of the press and the tunnels and shafts leading to the well shaft would have used access to what became the cellar/kitchen of the house itself. This would then have been filled in to give the impression of ground level. It’s possible that the present day access to the underground room would have been the place of access at the time of construction. So much soil and rock would have to have been removed that any other manner of excavation seems to hard to make sense.

The well and access to the room

The 'access' well

The ‘access’ well

Once the building was finished and the press installed the only way to get to it was via the well, covered by a small hut a few metres south-east of the main building. This is a deep well as the builders had to go down more than 18m before reaching the water level. Access down this well would have been by a removable rope, I’m assuming, anything more substantial would have raised suspicions in the event of a raid by the Okhrana.

Just before the water level (at 17.5m) a tunnel was constructed at right angles to the shaft, 8m long back towards the building. Then a shaft 15m high was built up towards ground level. At 8m another, short tunnel was constructed to provide access to the underground room itself. (This shaft goes up another 7 or so metres after the tunnel – but I can’t work out why.) Along the whole length of this shaft a ladder was fixed to the wall. Both the tunnels at the top and bottom were high enough for a person to walk through if bent double. Now electric lighting has been installed but, presumably, in the early 20th century the only lighting would have been oil lamps or candles.

All the tunnels and shafts are brick lined and the tunnels are arched.

The underground room

The underground room - looking towards present day entrance

The underground room – looking towards present day entrance

It’s a surprisingly large room if you think of the relatively narrow shafts and tunnels the Georgian Communists would have needed to negotiate to get there before starting work. I estimate the vaulted room to measure, roughly, 11m long, by 4m wide and 4m high – to the apex of the vaulted ceiling. This is large enough not to feel too claustrophobic to someone down there for a few hours.

But this isn’t the result of a group of amateurs. This is a well-made, professional construction. The floor is brick lined and the walls alternate with layers of brick and then large stone blocks cemented in place. The ceiling is a brick lined, barrel vault.

All that’s in the room now is a rusting-away, manually operated, lithographic printing press.

The press with the clandestine entrance

The press with the clandestine entrance

At the height of its use there would have been benches for the preparation of the plates, places for cutting the sheets for leaflets and folding and collating areas for pamphlets. I wouldn’t have thought it would have been possible to produce substantial books given the confines of the location but at the same time this location was constructed for the production of large scale, immediate propaganda and the aim would be to write the text, print and distribute in a relatively short time. More substantial books, such as some of the works of VI Lenin, would have been produced in commercial printing establishments outside of the country and then brought in illegally.

I can’t imagine this would have been the most healthy of places to have worked. Printing inks are, and have always been, quite toxic and there wouldn’t have been a great deal of ventilation in the cellar. I’m not aware of any through draft which could have taken the stale and chemical air out and bring fresh air in. The construction of a shaft to the ground above would have created a security threat as if stale air had a way to escape then so would noise.

Structurally, the tunnels, shafts and the room itself seem to be in remarkably good condition considering they have been neglected for most of the 117 years of their existence.

The Printing Press

The printing press

The printing press

I wasn’t able to make out any manufacturers marks but I understand it is of a German make and was smuggled into the country in pieces. By all accounts it was state of the art machine at the time of its installation. Yet another expense that was ‘donated’ by the Tsarist state. By the beginning of the 20th century these presses could turn out thousands of copies relatively cheaply and from one plate.

The house

The house

The house

The house above would have been a relatively wealthy but basic house at the time. The living area is up a few steps and on to a veranda which leads to two reasonably sized rooms. Now they are quite dirty, unorganized and nothing like they would have been at the time they were the cover for illegal revolutionary activity.

There are a number of pictures, plaques and the like of the revolutionary Marxist leaders, Marx, Lenin and Stalin as well as piled up books by those same leaders.

There’s also an interesting picture that gives the modern viewer an idea of how the underground room would have looked like when it was being used. No idea of when the picture was created but certainly long after the 1917 October Revolution and decades since the press printed in anger.

The press in operation

The press in operation

In the corner of one room (the one on the left) is an old, single bed – with a very lumpy mattress. Above this bed is a photo of Uncle Joe at about the age when the press was functioning. The guide will encourage you to have your picture taken, by him if you are alone, lying in ‘Stalin’s bed’. Here is another example of where tourism distorts history.

Any revolutionary who came to work on the press would not have stayed overnight in the house. That would have compromised security and put the whole of the project in jeopardy. And even though many of the leaflets and pamphlets would have been written by Uncle Joe he was not a printer and would have been in the way. Revolutionaries don’t always have to be able to carry out all tasks.

After April 1906

I haven’t been able to find out exactly why the press was abandoned in 1906. I can’t see that it was discovered by the Okhrana as I’m sure they would have destroyed the access shafts and tunnels – if not the whole of the building above. In the revolutionary movement there are always changes in trajectory, reaction becomes powerful for a period of time curtailing certain activities and then when circumstances become more favourable the revolution has moved on to other areas. The main focus of the Georgian Communists might have moved to other areas, for example Baku. Whatever the reason it wasn’t ever used again for its original purpose.

I’ve picked up a bit of information to indicate that it was opened as a museum in 1937 – probably at the time that Lavrenty Beria was in command of the Georgian Communist Party. That might have been when the present spiral metal staircase and new entrance to the underground room were created. Then the Great Patriotic War would have intervened.

Whatever might have been the fate of the building in subsequent years it now has no ‘legal’ status as a state museum and is showing serious signs of decay. The spiral staircase is a bit dodgy and the ladder that allowed access to the print room is rusting away in sympathy with the press itself.

Next to the house, on the right as the gates to the grounds are on the left, there’s a relatively modern, red brick building. This has a couple of ‘Hammer and Sickle’ images on the doors. This looks like it was, at some time in the past, a small museum to accompany the visit to the cellar. It looks derelict but I have no information if it is possible to enter. Having someone with Georgian/Russian language skills could possibly solve the problem.

Stalin Museum

For those who have visited the Stalin Museum in Gori you might have noticed the maquette of the house and underground press in a glass case in Room No 1, close to the entrance to Room No 2. For those who are about to go there look out for it as it gives an interesting 3D impression of the site.

Visiting the Underground Press

There don’t seem to be any official opening times. The Guardian of the space seems to be there all the time during the day (and night). He doesn’t speak English but takes you to all the places and you can work out how matters stood over a hundred years ago.

There’s no entry charge as such but a tip of GEL10 seemed to be reasonably well received.

Location and how to get there by public transport

Arrive at 300 Argel Metro station. Leave the station and take the left, uphill. Take the second road right, towards the hospital, on Tsinandali Street (there’s a small bakery on the right, at the end of the street as you enter from the main road). Continue along this road, with the hospital on your left, to the end to arrive at a junction, going through two pillars of an entrance gate. Turn left, again uphill. This is Kaspi Street. Continue uphill, keeping to the left at another junction, and you will soon see a red brick building on the right. In the garden of the house with the press there are a couple of large plane trees. This is Kaspi Street 7.

GPS

N 41º 41.445′

E 44º 49.795′

More on the Republic of Georgia

Chinese Revolutionary Art – 1975

Chairman Mao Tse-tung

Chairman Mao Tse-tung

More on China …..

Chinese Revolutionary Art – 1975

So far the emphasis on this blog has been on those examples of Socialist Realist art that I have encountered on various visits to Albania in the past few years – especially the ‘lapidars’ (public monuments and sculptures). One of the drivers for starting this project was the fear that due to both active political vandalism and simple lack of care many of these unique works of socialist art were likely to disappear in the near future and would be lost to posterity.

The Albanian Lapidar Survey of 2014 meant that, at least, those monuments that still existed and were identified at the time would be recorded in as much detail as possible, including a comprehensive photographic record of their condition in 2014. The fate of those lapidars has varied in the intervening years, some suffering further decay others suffering inappropriate (if at times well meaning) and destructive ‘renovation’.

With many of the lapidars I have visited I have attempted to carry out a deep reading of what they represent and have tried to put them in their historical context. I don’t even try to maintain that I have always got it right but in lieu of any other such record (much information about the more than 650 lapidars covered in the ALS investigation – and many other works of art, such as bas reliefs, mosaics, etc. – having been destroyed or lost in the chaotic years of the 1990s) I hope my efforts can help in reconstructing a comprehensive data base for the future. Although many have already been written about on this blog there are still many to follow.

Travelling quite extensively around the country I have encountered artistic elements of the socialist past that were outside the remit of the ALS. That includes the likes of the mosaics (Bestrove, Tirana Historical Museum and on the Bashkia in Ura Vajgurore – to name a few) and bas reliefs (for example, the Durres Tobacco Factory and Radio Kukesi) already mention as well as paintings (in the National Art Gallery in Tirana), statues (including the ‘Sculpture Park‘ behind the National Art Gallery and the 68 Girls of Fier), stand alone structures (such as the Party Emblem in Peshkopia) and murals (such as the Traditional Wedding Mural in the hotel restaurant also in Peshkopia), exhibits in museums and a number of other works that have (sometimes) miraculously survived the 30 years following the success of the counter-revolution.

By the time the Party of Labour of Albania had achieved victory over the fascist invaders in November 1944 the idea of Socialist Realist Art as something Socialist countries should encourage had become entrenched in the thinking of revolutionary Marxist-Leninists. I presented my interpretation of this when discussing art in Albania but the same arguments would suit the use of art in the other major Socialist countries, especially the Soviet Union and China.

I intend to look at Soviet Socialist Realist Art, initially, by reading the stories being told in the Metro stations, principally of Leningrad (now St Petersburg) and Moscow.

When it comes to the People’s Republic of China there are already examples of the use of art in the struggle to establish Socialism in the pages of Chinese Literature. Various issues of that magazine are available from 1953 to 1981 (the final 5 years an example of how literature and art can be used to turn back Socialism in a similar way it was used to promote Socialism from 1949 till just after the death of Chairman Mao in 1976).

The Chinese approach to literature and art can also be gleaned from the works of the writer and cultural theorist Lu Hsun.

Here I present a slide show of a collection of posters from the last, full revolutionary year of the People’s Republic of China (1975) to give an idea of how Chinese poster art had developed to that date.

More on China …..

Peking Review – 1968

People of the world unite and defeat the US aggressors

People of the world unite and defeat the US aggressors

More on China …..

Peking Review – 1968

Peking Review was the weekly political and informative magazine published between 1958 and 1978. With issue No 1 of 1979 the magazine was renamed Beijing Review, the new name bringing with it a new direction in the People’s Republic of China and was an open statement of the reintroduction of capitalism in the erstwhile Socialist Republic.

1968 saw the further consolidation of the Cultural Revolution and the open exposure of the counter-revolutionary plotting of ‘China’s Khruschov’ Liu Shao-chi. In August of the year the Soviet revisionists showed their true colours with the invasion of Czechoslovakia. Peking Review also continued to publish important statements and articles written by Chairman Mao.

The issues and topics included in 1968:

  • Soviet Revisionists’ plot to call counter-revolutionary International Meeting can only speed their own doom
  • Kiansi Provincial Revolutionary Committee formed in excellent situation
  • Strengthen the unity of the Army and the people on the basis of Mao Tse-tung’s Thought
  • Revolutionary people throughout China hail Chairman Mao’s latest instruction on Party Rectification
  • Chinese scientists survey Mt. Jolmo Lungma, the world’s highest peak
  • Earnestly implement the principle of ‘Supporting the Left, but not any particular faction’
  • Victory certainly belongs to the heroic Vietnamese People persevering in struggle
  • To be loyal to Chairman Mao one must combine study with application
  • A Directive from Chairman Mao concerning the great Strategic Plan for the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
  • British spy case broken in Lanchow
  • Financial crisis in the West testifies to further decay of Imperialism
  • Revolutionary Committees are fine
  • Statement by Comrade Mao Tse-tung, Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, in support of the Afro-American struggle against violent repression
  • Make a class analysis of factionalism
  • ‘Stalin Group’ in Soviet Union acclaims China’s Great Cultural Revolution
  • Chairman Mao Tse-tung on the Youth Movement
  • Old scabs, new betrayal – a denunciation of the French Revisionist Renegade Clique
  • President Nyerere of Tanzania visits China
  • China reaps rich summer harvest
  • Comrade Lin Piao warmly greets 25th Anniversary of founding of Albanian People’s Army
  • The great power of revolutionary mass criticism and repudiation
  • The Chinese and Albanian peoples and armies will fight side by side for ever
  • Struggle between two lines on transforming capitalist industry and commerce
  • Study Chairman Mao’s new contribution on Dialectics
  • Firm pillar of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – in celebration of the 41st anniversary of the founding of the Chinese people’s Liberation Army
  • Soviet Revisionism and Czechoslovakia
  • Resolutely take the road of integration with the workers, peasants and soldiers
  • Chinese Government and people strongly condemn Soviet Revisionist clique’s armed occupation of Czechoslovakia
  • The working class must exercise leadership in everything – Yao Wen-yuan
  • ‘Serve the people’ – Mao Tse-tung
  • Long Live the all-round victory of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
  • On the re-education of intellectuals
  • Chairman Mao celebrates National Day with the nation’s worker representatives and Peking’s Armymen and civilians
  • Chairman Mao warmly congratulates Comrade Enver Hoxha on his 60th birthday
  • Peking working class plays leading role in Cultural Revolution
  • Absorb fresh blood from the proletariat – an important question of Party consolidation
  • Soviet Revisionists step up capitalist restoration
  • The Dictatorship of the Proletariat is dictatorship by the masses
  • The nation launches angry tide denouncing arch-renegade Liu Shao-chi’s crimes
  • Thoroughly settle accounts with the renegade, traitor and scab Liu Shao-chi for his towering crimes
  • Conscientiously study the history of the struggle between the two lines
  • Chinese Party, Government and Army delegation concludes visit to heroic Albania
  • ‘Indigenous experts’ and revolution in agricultural education
  • Thoroughly repudiate Liu Shao-chi’s counter-revolutionary revisionist line on party building

Available issues of Peking Review:

1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978

A full Index for the year 1968, issues 1-52, was included in issue No. 52.

Peking Review - 1968 - 01

Peking Review – 1968 – 01

Peking Review - 1968 - 02

Peking Review – 1968 – 02

Peking Review - 1968 - 03

Peking Review – 1968 – 03

Peking Review - 1968 - 04

Peking Review – 1968 – 04

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 05

Peking Review – 1968 – 05

Peking Review - 1968 - 06

Peking Review – 1968 – 06

Peking Review - 1968 - 07

Peking Review – 1968 – 07

Peking Review - 1968 - 08

Peking Review – 1968 – 08

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 09

Peking Review – 1968 – 09

Peking Review - 1968 - 10

Peking Review – 1968 – 10

Peking Review - 1968 - 11

Peking Review – 1968 – 11

Peking Review - 1968 - 12

Peking Review – 1968 – 12

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 13

Peking Review – 1968 – 13

Peking Review - 1968 - 14

Peking Review – 1968 – 14

Peking Review - 1968 - 15

Peking Review – 1968 – 15

Peking Review - 1968 - 16

Peking Review – 1968 – 16

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 17

Peking Review – 1968 – 17

Peking Review - 1968 - 18

Peking Review – 1968 – 18

Peking Review - 1968 - 19

Peking Review – 1968 – 19

Peking Review - 1968 - 20

Peking Review – 1968 – 20

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 21

Peking Review – 1968 – 21

Peking Review - 1968 - 22

Peking Review – 1968 – 22

Peking Review - 1968 - 23

Peking Review – 1968 – 23

Peking Review - 1968 - 24

Peking Review – 1968 – 24

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 25

Peking Review – 1968 – 25

Peking Review - 1968 - 26

Peking Review – 1968 – 26

Peking Review - 1968 - 27

Peking Review – 1968 – 27

Peking Review - 1968 - 28

Peking Review – 1968 – 28

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 29

Peking Review – 1968 – 29

Peking Review - 1968 - 30

Peking Review – 1968 – 30

Peking Review - 1968 - 31

Peking Review – 1968 – 31

Peking Review - 1968 - 32

Peking Review – 1968 – 32

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 33

Peking Review – 1968 – 33

Peking Review - 1968 - 34

Peking Review – 1968 – 34

Peking Review - 1968 - 34 - Supplement

Peking Review – 1968 – 34 – Supplement

Peking Review - 1968 - 35

Peking Review – 1968 – 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 36

Peking Review – 1968 – 36

Peking Review - 1968 - 37

Peking Review – 1968 – 37

Peking Review - 1968 - 38

Peking Review – 1968 – 38

Peking Review - 1968 - 39

Peking Review – 1968 – 39

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 40

Peking Review – 1968 – 40

Peking Review - 1968 - 41

Peking Review – 1968 – 41

Peking Review - 1968 - 42

Peking Review – 1968 – 42

Peking Review - 1968 - 43

Peking Review – 1968 – 43

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 44

Peking Review – 1968 – 44

Peking Review - 1968 - 45

Peking Review – 1968 – 45

Peking Review - 1968 - 46

Peking Review – 1968 – 46

Peking Review - 1968 - 47

Peking Review – 1968 – 47

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 48

Peking Review – 1968 – 48

Peking Review - 1968 - 49

Peking Review – 1968 – 49

Peking Review - 1968 - 50

Peking Review – 1968 – 50

Peking Review - 1968 - 51

Peking Review – 1968 – 51

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peking Review - 1968 - 52

Peking Review – 1968 – 52

 

 

 

 

 

Beijing Review

From issue No. 1 of 1979 the weekly political and informative magazine Peking Review changed its name to Beijing Review. On page 3 of that number the editors made the open declaration of the change in the direction of the erstwhile ‘People’s Republic of China’.

By stating that the Communist Party of China (under the control then of Teng Hsiao-Ping/Deng Xiaoping ) sought

‘to accomplish socialist modernisation by the end of the century and turn China …. into an economically developed and fully democratic socialist country’

the CPC was openly declaring the rejection of the revolutionary path, which the country had been following since 1949, and the adoption of the road that would inevitably lead to the full scale establishment of capitalism.

For those who would like to follow this downward spiral into the murky depths of capitalism and imperialism in the issues of Beijing Review (complete for the years 1979-1990 – intermittently thereafter) you can do so by going to bannedthought – which also serves as an invaluable resource for more material about China during its revolutionary phase.

More on China …..