Development of German Socialism 1890-1939

The German Revolution - November 1918

The German Revolution – November 1918

Development of German Socialism 1890-1939

Apart from the works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Germany produced a disproportionate number of Socialist/Progressive theoreticians from the late 19th century up to the start of World War II. Some of these were involved in heated and substantial debates with VI Lenin as he was developing the revolutionary element of Marxism (which led, in 1917, to the victory of the October Revolution in Russia) whilst in German the emphasis was being placed upon what became Social Democracy.

Even one of the most revolutionary of the German Communists, Rosa Luxemburg, carried out a persistent polemic against Lenin on the need for an organised and structured revolutionary Party to lead the workers in the taking of state power. Whilst not the sole factory in the defeat of the Spartacist Revolution in 1918 the lack of such an ideologically organised Party certainly played its part in the failed insurrection.

The works presented below are all part of building up an extensive library of Socialist/Communist thought up to and following the October Revolution. The success in Russia in 1917 and the struggle for the building of Socialism subsequently certainly challenged the ideas of Social Democracy but the victory of revisionism following the death of JV Stalin has allowed these erroneous ideas to again establish a foothold in the anti-capitalist movement. The denigration of the achievements of Socialism in those countries which made efforts to construct a Socialist society from the 1945 onwards, principally the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics – USSR, the People’s Socialist Republic of Albania, the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, also played its role in undermining revolutionary Marxism-Leninism. The ‘easy’ (though in reality the most difficult) road of Social Democracy has been, therefore, able to re-establish its sway in worker and peasant movements worldwide.

German Communism

Creating German Communism, 1890-1990 – from popular protests to Socialist State, Eric D. Weitz, Princeton University Press, 1997, 465 pages.

Rosa Luxemburg

On the National Question, Marxist Internet Archive edition, with internal hyperlinks as well as outside links to other documents on the MIA site, 146 pages.

The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions, English translation of 1906 German original, MIA edition.

The Crisis in the German Social-Democracy, (The Junius Pamphlet), The Socialist Publication Society, NY, 1919, 141 pages.

The Russian Revolution, Workers Age Publishers, NY, 1940, Marxist Internet Archive edition, 2020, 41 pages.

The Russian Revolution and Leninism or Marxism, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1961, 117 pages.

The Accumulation of Capital, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1951, translated by Agnes Schwarzschild, introduction by Joan Robinson, 474 pages.

The Accumulation of Capital, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 2003, translated by Agnes Schwarzschild, with a new introduction by Tadeusz Kowalik, 453 pages.

The Accumulation of Capital – an anti-critique and Imperialism and the Accumulation of Capital (by Nikolai Bukharin, written in 1924). Two separate works in one volume, edited with an Introduction by Kenneth Tarbuck, Monthly Review Press, NY, 1972, 289 pages. Luxemburg’s work is a reply to critics of her 1913 work (see above), while Bukharin’s work is another critique of Luxemburg which focuses on her 1915 Anti-Critique.

Letters to Karl and Luise Kautsky from 1896 to 1918, edited Luise Kautsky, translated from German by Louis P. Lochner, Robert M. McBride and Co., NY, 1925, 249 pages. Luise Kautsky’s introduction to this book is a good source for biographical information about Rosa Luxemburg.

Letters from Prison, Publishing House of the Young International, Berlin,1923, 79 pages.

Reform or Revolution, Vanguard Pamphlets, New Malden, 1951, 74 pages.

Leninism or Marxism, Independent Labour Party, London, 1971, 16 pages.

The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions, Young Socialist Publication, Colombo, 1970, 88 pages.

The Essential Rosa Luxemburg – Reform or Revolution and the Mass Strike, Helen Scott, ed., Haymarket, Chicago, 2008, 194 pages.

Selected political writings of Rosa Luxemburg, Dick Howard. ed., Monthly Review, NY, 1971, 441 pages.

The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, Peter Hudis and Kevin B. Anderson, ed., Monthly Review, NY, 2004, 447 pages.

The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg, Volume 1, Economic Writings 1, Peter Hudis, ed., Verso, London, 2013, 559 pages.

Rosa Luxemburg, Women’s Liberation, and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution, Raya Dunayevskaya, Harvester Press, Sussex, 1981, 234 pages.

Rosa Luxemburg’s views on The Russian Revolution, Clara Zetkin, first published by the Communist International, 1922, reprint Red Star Publishers, 2017, 212 pages.

Karl Liebknecht

Militarism and Anti-Militarism, written in 1907, Rivers Press, Cambridge, 1973, Marxist Internet Archive version, 206 pages.

The future belongs to the People, speeches made since the beginning of the War, Macmillan, NY, November 1918, 148 pages.

Voices of Revolt – speeches of Karl Liebknecht, International, NY, 1927, 104 pages.

Karl Liebknecht – man without a country, Karl W. Meyer, Public Affairs Press, Washington, 1957, 191 pages.

In Memoriam to our Comrades Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, Martyrs to the German Revolution, Max Bedacht, Socialist Party of San Francisco, 1919, 16 pages.

During the Weimar Era

Communism in Germany under the Weimar Republic, Ben Fowkes, Macmillan, London, 1984), 134 pages.

Barricades in Berlin, Klaus Neukrantz, International/Martin Lawrence, NY/London, n.d. 1933?, 191 pages. This is a novel based closely on the actual events of the police attack on the 1929 May Day demonstrations in Berlin.

During the Nazi Era

The German Communist Resistance: 1933-1945, T. Derbent, Foreign Languages Press, Paris, 2021, 128 pages.

Ernst Thaelmann

Ernst Thaelmann, fighter against war and Fascism, International Labor Defense, NY, 1935, 16 pages.

German Social-Democracy in the Late 19th Century and Early 20th Century

General

German Social Democracy, six lectures, Bertrand Russell, with an appendix on the SDP and the Woman Question in Germany by Alys Russell, Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1896, 216 pages.

The German Social-Democratic Party: 1914-1921, Abraham Joseph Berlau, NY. Columbia University Ph.D. thesis, 1949, 373 pages.

The SDP and World War I

The Socialist Party in the Reichstag and the Declaration of War, P. G. La Chesnais, T. Fisher Unwin, London, 1915, 140 pages.

Otto Bauer

Otto Bauer (1881-1938): Thinker and Politician, Ewa Czerwinska-Schupp, Brill Open Access, Leiden. 2017, 442 pages.

August Bebel

Woman and Socialism, Jubilee 50th Edition, Socialist Literature Co., NY, 1910, 513 pages.

Speeches of August Bebel, International Publishers, NY, 1928, 104 pages.

My Life, by August Bebel, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, n.d. 1912?, 358 pages.

Karl Kautsky

The Class Struggle, written in 1892 about the 1891 Erfurt Program, Charles H. Kerr and Co., Chicago, 1910, 217 pages.

Communism in Central Europe in the time of the Reformation, T. Fisher Unwin, London, 1897, 298 pages.

Ethics and the Materialist Conception of History, n.d. but the original German book was written in 1906, 216 pages.

The Social Revolution, with 2 lectures presented by Karl Kautsky in Amsterdam in 1902: Reform and Revolution and The Day After the Revolution, Charles H. Kerr and Co., Chicago, 1910, 190 pages.

The High Cost of Living: Changes in Gold-Production and the Rise in Prices, Charles H. Kerr and Co., Chicago, 1914, 133 pages.

The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, translated by H. J. Stenning, National Labour Press, Manchester, n.d. 1918 or 1919?, 158 pages.

Terrorism and Communism: A Contribution to the Natural History of Revolution, National Labour Press, Ltd., London, n.d. but first published in 1920, 245 pages.

The Guilt of William Hohenzollern, Skeffington and Son, Ltd., London, n.d. but late 1919 or early 1920, 270 pages.

Georgia – a Social-Democratic Peasant Republic: Impressions and Observations, translated by H. J. Stenning and revised by the Author, International Bookshops, Ltd., London,1921), 118 pages.

The twelve who are to die: The trial of the Socialists-Revolutionists in Moscow, with W. Woitinsky, published by the Delegation of the Party of Socialists-Revolutionists (i.e., the Russian Social-Revolutionary Party), Berlin, 1922), 144 pages.

Foundations of Christianity – a study of Christian origins, International Publishers, NY, 1925, 488 pages.

The Labour Revolution, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1925, 293 pages.

The Economic Doctrines of Karl Marx, A. and C. Black Ltd., London, 1925, 264 pages. Translated by H. J. Stenning.

Are the Jews a Race?, International, NY, English translation of 2nd German ed., 1926, 254 pages.

Thomas More and His Utopia, International Publishers, NY, 1927, 257 pages.

Academic and Historical Works on the Revolutionary Movement in Germany

General and Overall

The German Revolution, 1918-1919, Ralph Haswell Lutz, Stanford University, 1922, 187 pages.

The German Revolution and After, Heinrich Ströbel, Jarrolds, London, n.d. but circa 1923, 319 pages.

The November Revolution (of 1918) and the Overthrow of the Emperor

And the Kaiser abdicates – the story of the death of the German Empire and the birth of the Republic, told by an eyewitness, S. Miles Bouton, Yale University, New Haven, 1920, 280 pages.

Germany after the Armistice, Maurice Berger, Putnam, NY, 1920, 374 pages. About prevailing social conditions and attitudes.

Ebert and the German Republic, Robert George Brehmer, Jr., University of Wisconsin MA thesis, 1926, 172 pages. Supportive of Ebert’s bourgeois-democratic politics.

The Spartacist Revolt – the attempted Socialist Revolution following World War I

Failure of a Revolution: Germany 1918-1919, Sebastian Haffner, Banner Press, Chicago, 1986, 224 pages. Somewhat messy scan; our apologies.

The Forgotten Revolution – Germany, a conceptual map, by Gaard Kets and James Muldoon, 2019, 24 pages.

The Spartacist Uprising of 1919, and the crisis of the German Socialist Movement, Eric Waldman, Marquette Univ. Press, Milwaukee 1958, 269 pages.

On the KPD up until World War II

We are neither visionaries nor Utopian dreamers, Willi Münzenberg, the League Against Imperialism, and the Comintern, 1925-1933, Fredrik Petersson, Ph.D Thesis, 2013, 598 pages.

 

Ernst Thälmann – German Communist leader – statue in Moscow

Ernst Thälmann - German Communist leader

Ernst Thälmann – German Communist leader

More on the USSR

Ernst Thaelmann – German Communist leader – statue in Moscow

It’s difficult to work out the thinking in the early days after the collapse of the (then Revisionist) Soviet Union in 1991 when it comes to revolutionary monuments. They display an element of schizophrenia, not knowing how to deal with the Soviet, Socialist past. But if you take something away with what are you going to replace it? Prior to the October Revolution of 1917 Russia was a backward, undeveloped, country with a population in the countryside that had barely moved from serfdom. The working class was small – yet highly organised and with a political understanding far exceeding that of their companions in the countries of the ‘west’ – and militarily it was of no consequence.

It was the construction of Socialism from 1917 to 1953 that built the country that turned the Soviet Union from a backward, peasant dominated country to an industrialised country with a sophisticated infrastructure and, after the re-construction following the Great Patriotic War, one of the most powerful nations on earth. And, of course, it was the Soviet Union that played the pivotal role in the defeat of Nazism.

So going back to the ‘pre-revolutionary’ period for imagery and options wasn’t really an option so, at least initially. As time moved on the defeat of the Napoleonic imperialist invasion was promoted to greater importance and the iconography of the Orthodox Church appeared in more public spaces.

Statues and other representations of JV Stalin had been removed in the 1950s after Khrushchev’s denunciation at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. This culminated in the removal of his body from the mausoleum he had shared with VI Lenin, for more than seven years, in October 1961. But even then this removal was carried out in the dead of night and at a time when the announcement could have been ‘buried’ by news of a successful nuclear test. However, such a radical move with the body of Lenin, the new capitalists feared, would almost certainly have been met with substantial public opposition.

Nonetheless, there are still images of, or references to, Stalin in public places in Moscow, such as; the roundel which depicts both VI Lenin and JV Stalin in the external decoration of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic pavilion at the Exhibition of Achievements of the National Economy (VDNKh); a young woman carries a copy of Stalin’s written works at the Kievskaya, Line 3, Metro station; and he also appears on a bas relief on the platform of Ploschad Vosstaniya Metro station in Leningrad.

There have been continued suggestions about the removal/destruction of the Lenin mausoleum (as was the fate of Georgi Dimitrov in Sofia, Bulgaria) but I would think that such discussions will get nowhere the longer the structure remains in its prominent location in Red Square.

In the early days of the collapse of the Soviet Union, when confusion reigned and any remaining Communist organisation was less than functional, a number of statues and monuments were either removed or destroyed with some of those that were taken down later re-appearing at the Muzeon Art Park.

At the same time there are still almost a hundred statues of VI Lenin in the Greater Moscow area, mostly in local communities but only a handful in the city centre (including the sculptural assembly in Oktyabrskaya Square); Karl Marx still gives a speech just across the road from the Bolshoi Theatre; Frederick Engels stands in a small square near the rebuilt Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, across the road from the ornate entrance to Kropotkinskaya metro station; and there’s a somewhat strange monument to Uncle Ho (Ho Chi Minh) close to the entrance to Akademicheskaya metro station south of the city centre.

And then there’s the statue to Ernst Thaelmann, the German Communist Party leader who was imprisoned by the Nazis and eventually murdered in their custody.

Ernst Thälmann - Moscow

Ernst Thälmann – Moscow

Fifty years old by Wilhelm Pieck

Ernst Thaelmann will be fifty years old on the sixteen of April. There is hardly a corner of the world where the name of the imprisoned leader of the Communist Party of Germany is not uttered with warmth and emotion by all workers and friends of peace and liberty and where his release is not insistently demanded. Ernst Thaelmann, whom the bloodthirsty hangmen of the German proletariat have already kept in prison for three years, whom they are torturing and ill-treating, has become the symbol of the struggle against war and Fascism, the struggle for Socialism, all over the world.

It was a long journey, rich in sacrifice and struggle, that the Hamburg docker, Ernst Thaelmann, had to make before he grew to be the great leader of the producing masses of Germany and one of the most popular leaders of the Communist International.

As the son of a class-conscious worker organised in the Social-Democratic Party, Ernst Thaelmann came into the Socialist movement in his early youth. He was hardly sixteen years old when he joined the Social-Democratic Party. The indigent circumstances of a proletarian family drove him very early into the drudgery of capitalist exploitation. These circumstances prevented him from following the well-meant advice of his teachers that this talented working-class boy should continue his education.

Ernst Thaelmann began his independent proletarian existence as a porter in the Hamburg docks. He made a trip to America as a coal trimmer, and worked as a daily labourer on American farms. Thus the international character of capitalist exploitation was hammered into him in early youth – but at the same time it taught him militant life of the international working class. Arriving back in Hamburg, he devoted his whole energy and all his spare time to work in party and trade union. After a heavy day’s work and an evening spent in the service of the organisation, he voraciously read and studied the Socialist literature. At first his activities were mainly in the trade union field. Very soon his work for the organisation, his personal courage, his self-sacrifice and the successful way in which he stood up for the workers’ demands, won him the confidence of the workers. They elected him to the local executive of their trade union, they sent him four times as delegate to the congress of the Transport Workers’ Union. And already in those days Ernst Thaelmann began his open and determined fight against opportunism.

In Hamburg, Germany’s largest city serving international trade, all the shady sides of the capitalist system were in evidence in their most blatant forms. Besides the strata of labor aristocrats corrupted by colonial surplus profits, it was the circumstance that Hamburg was the seat of a number of central trade union and co-operative institutions with their large bureaucratic apparatus which, more than anything, supplied a firm foundation for opportunism. Among other things it is also noteworthy that after the Revolution of 1918 these opportunist elements in Hamburg became the representatives of the most reactionary and right-wing opinions in Social Democracy. In order to indicate their attitude, it is enough to mention that it was one of the leaders of reactionary Hamburg Social-Democracy (Sarendorff) who replied to the united front proposals of the Communists before Hitler’s assumption to power with the provocative statement that he would ten times rather go with the bourgeoisie than once with the Communists.

In the struggle with these reactionary elements in the working-class movement Ernst Thaelmann became an uncompromising fighter for revolutionary Marxism.

When the slaughter of the nations began, and opportunism went over with banners flying to the camp of chauvinism and imperialism, the revolutionary worker, Ernst Thaelmann, did not waver one minute. From the very first days he fought resolutely against the war policy of Social-Democracy. In the first few weeks of the war he was ordered to the front. As an internationalist he set out to enlighten the troops, circulating illegal leaflets and newspapers and making a stand against the brutal treatment of the soldiers by Prussian militarism. For this he was deliberately victimised by the officers and given the most dangerous duties in the front line. Even from the trenches he kept in close touch with the illegally operating Hamburg opposition. Together with it he joined the Independent Social-Democratic Party. After the outbreak of the Revolution in November 1918, Ernst Thaelmann fought in the foremost ranks of the revolutionary workers against the counter-revolutionary troops which Ebert and Noske had sent to crush the workers of Hamburg and Bremen. The revolutionary workers of Hamburg, who recognised Thaelmann’s personal courage and daring, elected him to represent them in the City government of the port. It was due to him that out of the 42,000 members of the Independent Social-Democratic Party’s organisation in Hamburg, 40,000 declared their allegiance to the principles of the Communist International.

After the Party, following the defeat of the German proletariat in 1923, had devastatingly settled the opportunists, Ernst Thaelmann, as one of the most popular left-wing leaders, was summoned to the Central Committee of the Party, where he very soon rose to be leader of the Party. Under his leadership, the Party quickly and definitely rid itself of the ultra-left group of Ruth Fischer and Maslow, whose pseudo-radical, fatal policy had done immense harm to the mass-influence of the Party, threatening to isolate the Party from the masses.

With the help of the Communist International, he welded all the healthy and valuable forces of the Party in the leadership and in the organisation as a whole into an iron phalanx, which first flung the Trotskyist gang out of the ranks of the Party, only later to cleanse it with equal thoroughness of the Right opportunist and conciliators.

To all of us in the leadership, and to every single Party comrade, Thaelmann became a model revolutionary loyalty and devotion to the Communist International, the World Party of Lenin and Stalin. He taught us absolute devotion and passionate love for the Soviet Union and for our great leader Stalin. Thaelmann never wavered on this question. At the October Conference of the C.P.G. in 1932, he addressed the following words of warning to the Party:

‘There were sometimes in our own ranks comrades who thought themselves cleverer and more capable of judging various questions than was done in the definite decisions of our World Party. Here I stress with the greatest emphasis: our relations with the Comintern, this close, indestructible, firm confidence between the C.P.G. and the C.I. and its Executive – this is one of our Party, the inner-political struggles and disputes in the past and of the higher political maturity of our Party generally.’

The latest war-provocation by German Fascism recalls to our mind Thaelmann’s passionate struggle against war, against Fascism, for an international understanding among the nations, particularly between the working masses of Germany and France. Under Thaelmann’s leadership the Communist Party of Germany resolutely took over and resolutely continued the militant policy of the Spartakus-Bund against the Treaty of Versailles. In contrast to the criminal war-policy of the German-Fascists, however, the policy of the Communist Party is founded on international solidarity among the nations, on peaceful understanding between them, on the alliance of the working class of the whole world. This attitude was forcibly expressed by Thaelmann at that historic mass meeting of the French workers in Paris, at which he had to appear illegally because the French police tried to prevent him from attending. There Thaelmann said:

‘Even more boldly and more courageously we shall hold out our hands over frontier barriers to our militant comrades in France, joining with them in fraternal solidarity in a fighting alliance against the war-criminals and their accomplices. We shall not allow the German and French workers to be goaded again into mutual fratricide.’

The Bolshevist policy of the Communist Party under Thaelmann’s leadership led to a steady, constant increase in its mass-influence. At the elections to the German Reichstag in November 1932, six million working people voted for the Communist Party of Germany. The Party numbered more than 300,000 members, and it was fulfilling with ever-increasing success its great historic task of preparing the working masses of Germany for the struggle for and winning Socialism.

The development of the Party to a mass-party with a vigorous Bolshevist character was largely due to Ernst Thaelmann. He was more than usually sensitive to the temper of the masses, especially the Social-Democratic workers. For this reason he was accused by the group Nuemann of ‘running behind the S.P.G. Workers’. But Ernst Thaelmann’s work was anything but this. Quite the reverse: he tried to make the Social-Democratic workers realise the necessity of the united front in view of the rising wave of Fascism. He tried also, however, to create the conditions for this in the Party itself. At the meeting of the Central Committee on February 19, 1932, he said:

‘We say that the revolutionary united-front policy forms the main link in the proletarian policy in Germany. Comrades, a formulation like this is one of great moment; we have chosen it on mature reflection.’

And at the Berlin Anti-Fascist Unity Congress on July 10, 1932, Thaelmann said: ‘The question of the united front against Fascism … that is the question vital to the German proletariat.’ On the initiative of Ernst Thaelmann the ‘Anti-Fascist Action’ was inaugurated by the Communist Party in May, 1932, bringing the Communist and Social-Democratic workers closer together. And yet there were still present in the Party very powerful sectarian inhibitions among Communist workers against the united front with the Social-Democratic workers, chiefly caused by the struggle conducted against the Communist Party by the Social-Democratic leaders, especially the Social-Democratic Prussian Government, with the use of terrorist methods.

In these circumstances a number of grave errors were made by the Party, to correct which, on the strength of experience gained in the meantime, Ernst Thaelmann would naturally have acted with the utmost vigour if he had not been prevented from doing so by his arrest. The most serious error was that the Fascist menace was under-estimated and the main blow was not aimed at the Fascist menace as it became more and more clearly manifested.

On the bold initiative of Comrade Dimitrov, the Seventh World Congress decided to divert our tactics to the creation of the united front and the People’s Front, and set the Communist Party of Germany, in view of the altered situation in Germany, the special task of revising its relations with Social-Democracy, so that the rapid creation of the united front should become possible.

The working masses in town and country are beginning to revolt against their Fascist oppressors, although under the severe terror this result takes at first the simplest forms. The tasks facing the Communist Party of Germany in such a situation are great and fraught with responsibility. Now is the time, in spite of Fascist rule to terror and the suppression of all free expression of opinion in Germany, to counteract the mass chauvinist infection and to rally all available forces for the overthrow of this mad rule of the war-mongers, the oppressors and murderers of the working people of Germany. It is necessary to unite quickly and boldly all the opponents of the Fascists rule of terror against all reactionary attempts at sabotage and against all sectarian inhibitions; but above all to heal the split in the working class and to lead the Communist and Social-Democratic workers together into a united fighting front.

The C.P.G. lives on and is working despite the tremendous sacrifices it has to make under the Fascist terror. The heroic struggle, full of sacrifices, which tens of thousand of Communists and revolutionary workers are waging at the cost of the lives of thousands of their best, has shown that the Fascist terror and the reformist policy of capitulation were not able to demoralise the ranks of the proletariat. The fact that the Communist Party has been successful in this is due primarily to the heroic cadres raised by the Party under Thaelmann’s leadership.

For more than three years Thaelmann has been lying in a Fascist gaol. During all this time it has only been possible once – through the workers’ delegation from the Saar – for the proletariat to establish personal contact with Thaelmann. The Fascists allow the visit on that occasion in order to confuse the workers of the Saar, because they thought that the long period of terrorism in prison would have cowed Thaelmann and that he would not dare to speak openly to the workers. But Ernst Thaelmann bade farewell to the workers in these words: ‘I have been and I am being tortured! Greet the workers of the Saar from me as I would greet them!’ With that he showed that the brutalities of Fascist imprisonment could not break his revolutionary fortitude.

The indictment against Thaelmann published the other day is no more than a miserable declaration of bankruptcy of the part of the Fascist prosecution. That explains why the Fascists for three whole years have been continually postponing the trial and now want to abandon it all together. The latest report concerning Thaelmann’s fate should arouse the international proletariat the utmost vigilance. Thaelmann has been transferred from the custody of the remand authorities to that of the terrorist Gestapo gangs. This increases the mortal danger in which he is. But, on the other hand, in view of the publication of the indictment against Thaelmaan, the present moment is also favourable for the struggle for his release. If we succeeded in raising a tremendous storm of protest throughout the world, it will be possible to break down the prison walls and as in the case of Dimitrov, deliver Thaelmann from the clutches of the Fascist hangmen. The fact that Ernst Thaelmann has got to spend his fiftieth birthday in the gaols of Hitler-Fascism is an urgent reminder to all the anti-Fascists of the whole world that they must intensify to the utmost their campaign for the release of Thaelmann and the many thousands of imprisoned victims of the White Terror.

We greet Ernst Thaelmann on his fiftieth birthday! Freedom for him and for all anti-Fascists! Long live international solidarity! Long live the joint struggle of the workers of the entire world under the leadership of our great Stalin for peace and liberty for World Communism!

Originally published in The Communist Review, Vol. 3 No. 7, July 1936, pp.12–17, of the Communist Party of Australia. Reproduced in the Marxist Internet Archive.

Ernst Thälmann

April 16, 1886 – August 18, 1944

The Hamburg harbour worker Ernst Thälmann was a Social Democrat and organized in the transport workers’ association from 1904. Drafted as a reservist in January 1915, he experienced the horrors of war on the Western Front. In the fall of 1918, he did not return to the troops from leave in Hamburg, remaining in the city until the revolution. He joined the USPD and was elected onto Hamburg’s city parliament in 1919. Along with the majority of the Hamburg USPD, he was in favour of joining the Communist International in 1920 and was a delegate at the party conference in Halle in October of that year. From 1921 he was chairman of the Hamburg KPD district and a member of the party committee for the Wasserkante region. A popular figure in Hamburg, Thälmann was employed as a party secretary there from 1921 and was an uninterrupted member of the city parliament until 1933. He was on the KPD’s central committee from 1921 on and was elected into the party’s leadership at the IXth party conference in Frankfurt in 1924, remaining a member from then on. Representing the party in the Reichstag from 1924 to 1933, he was the KPD’s candidate for the Reich presidential elections in 1925 and 1932. Arrested on March 3, 1933, he remained determined in prison. Thälmann spent twelve years in solitary confinement, first in Moabit, then in Hannover and Bautzen. After being transferred to Buchenwald concentration camp, Ernst Thälmann was murdered on August 18, 1944.

Reproduced from the German Resistance Memorial Centre website.

Related – other statues of revolutionaries in Moscow

Park of the Fallen/Muzeon Art Park

Ho Chi Minh monument

Karl Marx

Frederick Engels

VI Lenin

Location of statue;

At the entrance to the Aeroport Metro station on Line 2, (the dark green one), Khoroshyovsky District, Moscow.

GPS;

55.8003°N

37.5329°E

More on the USSR

Soviet Army Monument – Sofia

Soviet Army Monument - Иван Иванов

Soviet Army Monument – Иван Иванов

Soviet Army Monument – Sofia

Possibly the largest extant sculptural work of Socialist Realism in Sofia, and quite possibly the whole country, is the Monument to the Soviet Army which was commissioned and erected in 1954 on the occasion of the 10 anniversary of the Liberation of Sofia by the Red Army.

The principal monument was a group sculpture of; a Red Army soldier in the centre, with his rifle held high above his head in his right hand; to his right there’s a young Bulgarian woman holding her baby; and on his left there’s a Bulgarian man. This trio was standing on a 37 metre high pedestal which is reached by a series of stepped platforms from the edge of the complex which starts near the main road.

It is ‘was’ rather than ‘is’ because this particular element of the monument was removed in December 2023. In theory this will eventually be given a place in the garden of the Museum of Socialist Art. It had not appeared there in April 2024 and the reason for the delay is unknown, possibly because it would be in need of some cleaning and restoration. It is hoped that is the only reason for the delay and that reactionaries in the Bulgarian political community are not using it as an excuse in the hope the delay will erase the sculpture from the public consciousness.

Although this trio might have been the focal point of the monument it is by no means the only element of complex.

The principal entrance is the stepped route to the pedestal which is flanked by two, low level group sculptures. Both these groups represent Red Army men and women being welcomed by the local populace. They bring food and drink for the tired soldiers and the appreciation of their efforts are being demonstrated by Bulgarians of all ages. There’s a feeling of joy and celebration as the people are freed from the dominance of the invading Nazis and the possibility of being able to build a new future.

On the sides of the platform on which the pedestal stands are three, large bas relief panels. The ones on the right and left depict war scenes from battles that would have proceeded the liberation of Bulgaria as the Red Army swept west to eventually crush the Nazi beast in its lair in Berlin the following year. The third panel, on the south side, depicts the Soviet ‘home front’ where those not in the actual fighting were making the success of the Red Army possible by their work in the factories and the fields.

All these five sculptural elements have suffered quite severe vandalism, mainly by paint, but there doesn’t seem to be any serious physical damage. At least nothing that couldn’t be rectified with careful cleaning and restoration. Whether that will be their fate or not is unknown.

Although the sculpture on the pedestal might have been recently removed access to the complex is still restricted. A 2 metre high metal fence surrounds every single element of the monument, the sculptures as well as the approach steps and platforms.

Obviously there have been efforts, some at least successful, to breach this barrier in the past but equally serious efforts have been made to repair those breaches. I walked around the whole perimeter and was unable to find any way to get inside the fence. For that reason the photographic record is not dependent upon what I would have liked to have presented rather it what was possible through gaps in the fence or standing on benches at one the edge of the barrier.

The fact that the final fate of this monument has been under discussion for 30 years indicates the uncertainty that the reactionaries in power in Bulgaria feel about the public memory of the liberation from Fascism and the role the Red Army played in that. Removing the principal trio with the ‘promise’ they would be relocated to the Museum of Socialist Art is only part of the ‘solution’. Those sculptural elements that remain are larger and more difficult to place outside of their present, and original, context.

Unfortunately, I don’t have any information about those artists and architects who were involved in the creation and installation of the monument.

How to get there:

Leave the underpass of the Sofia University Metro station by the south east exit and walk along the south side of Tsar Osvoboditel Boulevard. After about 200 metres the area of the complex is unmistakeable on the right. In April 2024 the pedestal was still surrounded by scaffolding but the shiny metal fence stands out like a sore thumb.

Location:

In the park, on the south side of Tsar Osvoboditel Boulevard, close to the Sofia University Metro station.

GPS:

2°41′26″N

23°20′4″E