The Marxist

Posted on by
Reply
The Marxist

The Marxist

More on Britain …

View of the world

Ukraine – what you’re not told

The Marxist

The first issues of The Marxist were published by a group of ex-members of the Communist Party of Great Britain who had left following that organisation’s total adoption of revisionism. This manifested itself very early on, in 1951, with the adoption of the Party Programme ‘The British Road to Socialism’. This revisionist stance even preceded that of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union which, from late 1956, had turned its back on the revolutionary ideology of Marxism-Leninism. The crucial event is this shift in policy in the Soviet Union was Nikita Khrushchev’s so-called ‘secret speech’ – where he attacked Comrade Stalin and all the achievements of the Soviet Union since the October Revolution of 1917 – at the Party’s 20th Congress in November of that year.

This caused confusion in most Communist Parties worldwide and it was no different in Britain. Many (both those still in the Revisionist CPGB and those who had left – or had been expelled) congregated in the Committee to Defeat Revisionism for Communist Unity (CDRCU) and the decision to publish The Marxist was a late manifestation of the work of that group.

As it says in the first article in issue No 1, Our Purpose;

‘This journal has come into being because of the urgent need to bring Marxist-Leninist thought and analysis back into the British political struggle.’ p3.

Amongst the early contributors were Reg Birch – who was later one of the principle founding members of the Communist Party of Britain (Marxist-Leninist) CPB(ML) in 1968 – and William Ash – who was for many years the editor of The Worker, the newspaper of the CPB(ML).

In the early days it was produced by a group of like-minded anti-revisionists. However, it soon became evident that being anti wasn’t enough and if the British working class were to have any say in their future then a proper constituted Marxist-Leninist Communist party was necessary. Although there were quite a lot of areas where there was common ground among different individuals it seems that personalities got in the way. The result was a fractured anti-revisionist movement – and the formation of a number of groups. When unity was needed it was not provided.

Some of those wanted to be ‘big fish in little pools’ and refused to unite in the common battle against British capitalism and imperialism. As is always a risk of little pools they dried up and few organisations had any significant longevity. The Marxist lasted longer than most.

A number of other organisations claiming the title ‘Marxist-Leninist’ appeared – and disappeared through the 1980s and 1990s. Examples of some of their publications can be seen on the the page devoted to The Marxist-Leninist and Anti-Revisionist Movement in Britain. To the best of our knowledge the only Marxist-Leninist organisation that was formed in the late 1960s/early 1970s that still exists is the Communist Party of Britain (Marxist-Leninist) – CPB(ML).

The group that produced The Marxist went through a number of manifestations until the last (available) issue was published in 1994. For the first three years it wasn’t associated with any specific grouping but from September 1969 the magazine became the mouthpiece of the Communist Federation of Britain (Marxist-Leninist). However, sometime around 1977 the Federation must have dissolved and the publication came out under the name of the Marxist Industrial Group. After No. 44, at the end of 1985, there was a gap of more than five years before No. 45 was published. Here the name of the publisher became Marxist Publications – and that was the name it was published under until No. 52, (published at the end of 1994) the last in this list. Whether that was the very last issue we do not know, there’s no statement to the fact that it was.

[Many of these scans come originally from the Marxist Internet Archive, who we thank for their work.]

Volume 1, No. 1, November-December 1966, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1966, 29 pages.

Volume 1, No. 3, March-April 1967, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1967, 33 pages.

Volume 1, No. 4, May-June 1967, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1967, 33 pages.

Volume 1, No. 6, Spring 1968, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1968, 21 pages.

Volume 1, No. 7, Summer 1968, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1968, 25 pages.

Volume 1, No. 8, Autumn 1968, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1968, 21 pages.

Volume 1, No. 9, Spring 1969, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1969, 26 pages.

No. 10, April 1969, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1969, 21 pages.

No. 11, July 1969, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1969, 24 pages.

No. 12, Autumn 1969, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1969, 26 pages.

No. 13, Winter 1970, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1970, 21 pages.

No. 14, Spring 1970, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1970, 25 pages.

No. 15, Autumn 1970, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1970, 24 pages.

No. 16, January 1971, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1971, 22 pages.

No. 17, 1971, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1971, 34 pages.

No. 18, 1971, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1971, 32 pages.

No. 20, 1971/2? Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1971/2? 32 pages.

No. 21, 1973, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1973, 32 pages.

No. 24, 1973, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1973, 32 pages.

No. 28, 1975, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1975, 32 pages.

No. 30, 1976, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1976, 32 pages.

No. 31, 1976, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1976, 32 pages.

No. 32, 1977, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1977, 32 pages.

No. 33, 1978, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1978, 24 pages.

No. 34, 1979, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1979, 25 pages.

No. 35, 1980, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1980, 22 pages.

No. 36, 1980, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1980, 18 pages.

No. 37, 1981, Oasis Publishing Company, London, 1981, 25 pages.

No. 38, 1982, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1982, 18 pages.

No. 39, 1982, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1982, 22 pages.

No. 40, 1983, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1983, 32 pages.

No. 41, 1983, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1983, 22 pages.

No. 42, 1984, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1984, 29 pages.

Supplement to No. 42, 1984, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1984, 5 pages.

No. 43, 1985, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1985, 26 pages.

No. 44, 1985, Marxist Industrial Group, London, 1985, 26 pages.

No. 45, 1991, Marxist Publications, London, 1991, 22 pages.

No. 46, 1991, Marxist Publications, London, 1991, 26 pages.

No. 48, 1992, Marxist Publications, London, 1992, 22 pages.

No. 50, 1993, Marxist Publications, London, 1993, 22 pages.

No. 51, 1994, Marxist Publications, London, 1994, 30 pages.

No. 52, 1994, Marxist Publications, London, 1994, 26 pages.

More on Britain …

View of the world

Ukraine – what you’re not told

Bob Dylan, Masters of War and the Ukraine Crisis

Posted on by
Reply
Ukrainian servicemen on patrol

Ukrainian servicemen on patrol

View of the world

Ukraine – what you’re not told

Bob Dylan, Masters of War and the Ukraine Crisis

[The article below was first published on the Common Dreams website on 22nd February 2022. It’s reproduced here as part of the anti-war campaign that must develop to prevent matters getting out of hand. This in no way means support for Putin’s actions (although there is an understanding of the threat the Russians feel from expansive NATO) but also highlights the overwhelming hypocrisy and lies that are emanating from both the Americans and the British.]

Bob Dylan, Masters of War and the Ukraine Crisis

by Norman Solomon

Red-white-and-blue chauvinism is running wild. Yet there are real diplomatic alternatives to the collision course for war.

Fifty-nine years ago, Bob Dylan recorded “With God on Our Side.” You probably haven’t heard it on the radio for a very long time, if ever, but right now you could listen to it as his most evergreen of topical songs:

I’ve learned to hate the Russians
All through my whole life
If another war comes
It’s them we must fight
To hate them and fear them
To run and to hide
And accept it all bravely
With God on my side

In recent days, media coverage of a possible summit between Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin has taken on almost wistful qualities, as though the horsemen of the apocalypse are already out of the barn.

Fatalism is easy for the laptop warriors and blow-dried studio pundits who keep insisting on the need to get tough with “the Russians,” by which they mean the Russian government. Actual people who suffer and die in war easily become faraway abstractions. “And you never ask questions / When God’s on your side.”

During the last six decades, the religiosity of U.S. militarism has faded into a more generalized set of assumptions—shared, in the current crisis, across traditional political spectrums. Ignorance about NATO’s history feeds into the good vs. evil bromides that are so easy to ingest and internalize.

On Capitol Hill, it’s hard to find a single member of Congress willing to call NATO what it has long been: an alliance for war (Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya) with virtually nothing to do with “defense” other than the defense of vast weapons sales and, at times, even fantasies of regime change in Russia.

The reverence and adulation gushing from the Capitol and corporate media (including NPR and PBS) toward NATO and its U.S. leadership are wonders of thinly veiled jingoism. About other societies, reviled ones, we would hear labels like “propaganda.” Here the supposed truisms are laundered and flat-ironed as common sense.

Glimmers of inconvenient truth have flickered only rarely in mainstream U.S. media outlets, while a bit more likely in Europe. “Biden has said repeatedly that the U.S. is open to diplomacy with Russia, but on the issue that Moscow has most emphasized—NATO enlargement—there has been no American diplomacy at all,” Jeffrey Sachs wrote in the Financial Times as this week began. “Putin has repeatedly demanded that the U.S. forswear NATO’s enlargement into Ukraine, while Biden has repeatedly asserted that membership of the alliance is Ukraine’s choice.”

As Sachs noted, “Many insist that NATO enlargement is not the real issue for Putin and that he wants to recreate the Russian empire, pure and simple. Everything else, including NATO enlargement, they claim, is a mere distraction. This is utterly mistaken. Russia has adamantly opposed NATO expansion towards the east for 30 years, first under Boris Yeltsin and now Putin…. Neither the U.S. nor Russia wants the other’s military on their doorstep. Pledging no NATO enlargement is not appeasement. It does not cede Ukrainian territory. It does not undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty.”

Whether or not they know much about such history, American media elites and members of Congress don’t seem to care about it. Red-white-and-blue chauvinism is running wild. Yet there are real diplomatic alternatives to the collision course for war.

Speaking Monday on Democracy Now!, Katrina vanden Heuvel—editorial director of The Nation and a longtime Russia expert—said that implementing the Minsk accords could be a path toward peace in Ukraine. Also, she pointed out, “there is talk now not just of the NATO issue, which is so key, but also a new security architecture in Europe.”

Desperately needed is a new European security framework, to demilitarize and defuse conflicts between Russia and U.S. allies. But the same approach that for three decades pushed to expand NATO to Russia’s borders is now gung-ho to keep upping the ante, no matter how much doing so increases the chances of a direct clash between the world’s two nuclear-weapons superpowers.

The last U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union before it collapsed, Jack Matlock, wrote last week: “Since President Putin’s major demand is an assurance that NATO will take no further members, and specifically not Ukraine or Georgia, obviously there would have been no basis for the present crisis if there had been no expansion of the alliance following the end of the Cold War, or if the expansion had occurred in harmony with building a security structure in Europe that included Russia.”

But excluding Russia from security structures, while encircling it with armed-to-the-teeth adversaries, was a clear goal of NATO’s expansion. Less obvious was the realized goal of turning Eastern European nations into customers for vast arms sales.

A gripping chapter in “The Spoils of War,” a new book by Andrew Cockburn, spells out the mega-corporate zeal behind the massive campaigns to expand NATO beginning in the 1990s. Huge Pentagon contractors like Lockheed Martin were downcast about the dissolution of the USSR and feared that military sales would keep slumping. But there were some potential big new markets on the horizon.

“One especially promising market was among the former members of the defunct Warsaw Pact,” Cockburn wrote. “Were they to join NATO, they would be natural customers for products such as the F-16 fighter that Lockheed had inherited from General Dynamics. There was one minor impediment: the [George H. W.] Bush administration had already promised Moscow that NATO would not move east, a pledge that was part of the settlement ending the Cold War.”

By the time legendary foreign-policy sage George F. Kennan issued his unequivocal warning in 1997—“expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the post-Cold War era”—the expansion was already happening.

As Cockburn notes, “By 2014, the 12 new members had purchased close to $17 billion worth of American weapons.”

If you think those weapons transactions were about keeping up with the Russians, you’ve been trusting way too much U.S. corporate media. “As of late 2020,” Cockburn’s book explains, NATO’s collective military spending “had hit $1.03 trillion, or roughly 20 times Russia’s military budget.”

Let’s leave the last words here to Bob Dylan, from another song that isn’t on radio playlists. “Masters of War.”

Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good?
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could?

Norman Solomon is co-founder and national coordinator of RootsAction.org. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death“ (2006) and “Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America’s Warfare State” (2007).

Related articles:

UK spends over £80m on media in 20 countries around Russia

America’s real adversaries are its European and other allies

UK commanders in Ukraine met neo-Nazi-linked National Guard to ‘deepen military cooperation’

View of the world

Ukraine – what you’re not told

British working class history

Posted on by
Reply
Collier, 1814

Collier, 1814

More on Britain …

View of the world

Ukraine – what you’re not told

Working class history in Britain

This page will contain a mix of aspects of the History of the British Working Class. It will include items of class struggle; trade unions; significant strikes and militant action; certain key individuals; social conditions; reports and studies of different aspects of life that had an effect on the working class; some successes – and some failures; some specific to Merseyside; various other ‘political movements’, e.g. anarchism; so very much a hodgepodge. But, hopefully, it will be able to provide a broad picture of working class struggle of the period – as well as providing some historical context.

These will be from various political perspectives. And that’s because much of these documents date from the 1960s to the early/mid 1980s’. During that period the organised working class in Britain were getting off their knees and fighting against the injustices that existed throughout the United Kingdom. As there was activity this meant that many organisations were able to attract members and/or supporters and the result of that was an increase in the amount of material produced.

Most of those organisations never had any money and that had an impact upon the material they produced. Little money was often available to produce the material at the level of quality that would have been desired. What was most important was getting the information out – however amateur it might have looked to the reader. Modern readers will be more aware of the low quality – it wasn’t such an issue when these documents were produced and distributed.

All these stories should be seen in the context of the other political groups that are documented on the Britain page.

Working class history

The conditions of workers in Great Britain, Germany and the Soviet Union, 1932-38, J Kuczynski, Left Book Club, Gollanz, London, 1939, 92 pages.

A textbook of industrial history in wartime, including a record of the Shop Stewards Movement, Wal Hannington, The Marxist Textbook Series, No 5, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1940, 119 pages.

Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844, Frederick Engels, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1943, 149 pages. From Project Gutenberg website.

Russia is for Peace, DN Pritt, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1951, 106 pages.

Education and the Industrial Revolution, WD Morris, National Council of Labour Colleges, NCLC, Tillicoultry, 1951?, 24 pages.

Selections from William Morris, FLPH, Moscow, 1959, 519 pages.

What’s Wrong at Fords? Published by the Joint Ford Shop Stewards Committee for the information of their fellow trade unionists on the history of the disputes at Fords, London, 1963, 16 pages.

The matter of Britain, essays in a living culture, AL Morton, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1966, 166 pages.

Unity – Strength – Progress, The Story of the Transport and General Workers Union (T&GWU), T&GWU, London, June 1967, 40 pages.

Bill Feeley, Singer, Steel Erector, International Brigader, AUEW (Constructional), Progress Bookshop, Manchester, 1968, 32 pages.

Industry and Empire, an economic history of Britain since 1750, EJ Hobsbawm, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1968, 336 pages.

A Short History of the British Labour Movement, Logie Barrow, Sheed and Ward, London, 1969, 68 pages.

Re-Education, No 1 June-July 1969, no publisher, 14 pages.

Women’s Struggle, Newsletter of the Women’s Liberation National Co-ordinating Committee, Volume 1 No 3, 1970, London, 36 pages.

Productivity Dealing and the Miners’ Next Step, John Charlton, International Socialists, Pluto, London, 1970?, 16 pages.

The Eight Hour Day, Trade Union Theory and History, Series 2, No. 1, Tom Mann, Workers’ Control, Nottingham, 1970, 10 pages.

Socialism and the Churches, Trade Union Theory and History, Series 2, No. 2, Tom Mann, Workers’ Control, Nottingham, 1970, 8 pages.

Democracy or Disruption, Trade Union Theory and History, Series 2, No. 7, Tom Mann, Workers’ Control, Nottingham, 1970, 2 pages.

The Great March, Trade Union Congress, London, 1971, 48 pages.

The Political Theory of the Student Movement – notes for a Marxist critique, Revolutionary Socialist Students Federation, London, 1971, 93 pages.

Bulletin 1, North West Group for the Study of Labour History, Liverpool, n.d., 1970s, 18 pages.

Children’s Strikes in 1911, Dave Marsden, History Workshop Pamphlets, No 9, Oxford?, 1973, 48 pages.

The Luddites, Machine-breakers of the Early Nineteenth Century, …. the most famous of the protests against the owners of the machines and their managers, Douglas Liversidge, Watts, London, 1973, 96 pages.

British Labour and the Russian Revolution, The Leeds Convention, Report from The Daily Herald, introduction by Ken Coates, Documents on Socialist History, No. 1, Spokesman Books, 1974?, 40 pages.

Industrial Democracy, Report by the Trade Union Congress (TUC) General Council to the 1974 Trades Union Congress, TUC, London, 1974, 52 pages.

Every One a Witness, The Norman Age, Commentaries of an era, AF Scott, Purnell, London, 1976, 336 pages. [Perhaps slightly out of place but has some interesting factual information.]

Liverpool 1921-1922, the classic account of life on the Dole and the struggle against the Means Test, George Garrett, introduction by Jerry Dawson, Whitechapel Press, Liverpool, n.d., 1976?, 38 pages.

The General Strike, 50th Anniversary Souvenir, New English Library, London, 1976, 32 pages.

The English Utopia, AL Morton, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1978, 295 pages.

The life and ideas of Robert Owen, AL Morton, International Publishers, New York, 1978, 239 pages.

The International Working Men’s Association and the Working Class Movement in Manchester 1865-85, Edmond and Ruth Frow, Working Class Movement Library (WCML), Manchester, 1979, 26 pages.

Towards press freedom, Campaign for Press Freedom, London, September 1979, 17 pages.

The Exploding Prison, prison riots and the case of Hull, JE Thomas and R Pooley, Junction Books, London, 1980, 150 pages.

The Soldiers’ Strikes of 1919, Andrew Rothstein, Macmillan, London, 1980, 114 pages.

The Match Girls Strike 1888, Reg Beer, Labour Museum Pamphlets, No 2, London?, 1980, 69 pages.

The Railwaymen, National Union of Railwaymen, (NUR), 1980?, 12 pages.

The Poplar Story, Teachers Notes No 5, Labour Museum, London?, 1980?, 17 pages.

When the People Arose, The Peasants Revolt of 1381, AL Morton, a Communist Party pamphlet, published to mark the 600th anniversary of the great peasant uprising in south-east England, CPGB, London, May 1981, 40 pages.

Lucas Aerospace Combine Shop Stewards Committee – plan to move away from armaments production, 1981;

Arms conversion Information Pack, July 1981, 30 pages.

Arms Conversion Planning – Theory and Practice, 16 pages.

Military spending, defence cuts and alternative employment, 10 pages.

The impact of military spending on the Machinists Union, 14 pages.

Liverpool, a brief history, Alan Brack, Liverpool PR Office, 1982, 6 pages.

Assault on the Unions, Counter Information Services, Report No. 34, Summer 1984, 36 pages.

Inside the myth, Orwell – views from the Left, edited by Christopher Norris, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1984, 287 pages.

‘New Realism’, the politics of fear, SO Davies Memorial Lecture, Arthur Scargill, Merthyr Tydfil Trades Union Council, 1987, 20 pages.

1688 – How Glorious was the Revolution, AL Morton, Our History, Pamphlet 79, London?, July 1988, 33 pages.

Thomas Paine, Citizen of the world, exhibition booklet, Working Class Movement Library, Manchester, 2020, 31 pages.

Poverty in Britain

Condemned, A Shelter Report on Housing and Poverty, Shelter, London, 1971, 88 pages.

Born to Fail, Peter Wedge and Hilary Prosser, Arrow, London, 1973, 68 pages.

Unequal Britain, A report on the cycle of Inequality, Frank Field, Arrow, London, 1973, 68 pages.

Down the Road, Unemployment and the Fight for the Right to Work, Sarah Cox and Robert Golden, Writers and Readers Publishing Co-operative, London, 1977, 128 pages.

Working class struggles

Claimant’s Handbook for Strikers, Claimant’s Union, London?, 1971, 52 pages.

The Postal Workers and the Tory Offensive, Paul Foot, Socialist Worker pamphlet, London, 1971, 28 pages.

The UCS Work-in, Foreword by Jimmy Reid, Willie Thompson and Finley Hart, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1972, 95 pages.

Lessons of the General Strike 1926, Bob Dent, Millennium, Liverpool, April 1973, 28 pages.

The Fine Tubes Strike, TGWU/AEUW Official Dispute, 15.6.70 – 15.6.73, Tony Beck, Stage 1, London, 1974, 128 pages.

The Shrewsbury Three, Strikes, Pickets and Conspiracy, Foreword by Bert Ramelson, Jim Arnison, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1974, 84 pages.

Shrewsbury, Whose Conspiracy, The need for an inquiry, Des Warren, New Park, London, 1976, 36 pages.

Who Profits from Coal? The Niclas Society, Cardiff, 1980?, 15 pages.

Unemployed Demonstrations, Salford and Manchester, October 1931, Wilf Gray, Mick Jenkins, Edmund and Ruth Frow, Working Class Movement Library (WCML), Manchester, 1981, 20 pages.

Going Private, The case against private medicine – a report from Fightback and the Politics of Health Group, London, 1981?, 52 pages.

Health Leaflets, a few examples of leaflets produced in the struggle to defend the National Health Service, 1981?, 4 pages.

Coal Not Dole, National Union of Mineworkers, Sheffield, 1984, 12 pages.

‘A strike-breaker is a traitor’, poster produced at the time of the 1984-85 Miners’ Strike in Britain. Reuses an image of blacklegs (scabs) from a mining dispute in the Garw Valley in South Wales in 1929. Together with Jack London’s definition of a scab. 1984/5?, 1 page.

The British Worker, May 5th – May 14th 1926, the daily newspaper produced by the Trades Union Congress during the General Strike of 1926. Reproduced by the Labour Museum, London, n.d., possibly in 1984/5 as a response to the Miners’ Strike taking place at the time, includes two version of issue No 8, 50 pages.

Response to the Lightman Inquiry, Arthur Scargill, Campaign to Defend Scargill and Heathfield, Women Against Pit Closures, 1990, 24 pages.

Industrial Revolution

Finch Brothers’ Foundry, Sticklepath, Okehampton, Devon, n.d., early 1970s, 16 pages.

Sticklepath Museum of Rural Industry, n.d., 1970s, 4 pages.

JB Dancer, HB Marton, North Western Museum of Science and Technology, Manchester, n.d., 1970s, 15 pages.

Papermaking, RL Hills, North Western Museum of Science and Technology, n.d., 1970s, 17 pages.

Lace-Making in Hamilton, Jessie Lochhead, Hamilton Handbooks, Public Libraries, 1971, 20 pages.

Hand-loom Weaving in Hamilton and District, G Walker, Hamilton District Museum, 1975, 28 pages.

Horse Drawn Transport in Hamilton Museum, G Walker, Hamilton District Museum, 1975, 36 pages.

The Coalbrookdale Ironworks, a short history, Ironbridge Gorge Trust, Telford, 1975, 22 pages.

Industrial Archaeology in Devon, Walter Minchinton, Tor Mark Press, Truro, 1976, 34 pages.

Industrial Archaeology of Cornwall, WH Curnow, Tor Mark Press, Truro, n.d, 1970s, 32 pages.

The Hay Inclined Plane, Ironbridge Gorge Trust, Telford, 1978, 12 pages.

Blists Hill Open Air Museum, Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust, 1978, 16 pages.

The Coalbrookdale Museum of Iron, a guide to the Museum and the Old Furnace, Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust, Telford, 1979. 16 pages.

The Iron Bridge, a short history of the first iron bridge in the world, Ironbridge Gorge Trust, Telford, 1979, 12 pages.

Merseyside

Who Controls Liverpool Industry? An analysis of profits and control of some large firms, Labour Research Department and the Liverpool Trades Council, Liverpool, November 1969

Government White Paper ‘In Place of Strife’ – OUT, North West [England] Shop Stewards Action Committee, Ellesmere Port, 1969, 12 pages.

Exposed, Commission on Industrial Relations, Big Flame, Birkenhead, 1970, 10 pages.

Kirkby Resistance, Fisher Bendix Occupation Special, Kirkby International Socialists, 1972, 14 pages.

Leo McCree, What a man, what a fighter, an account of Leo McCree’s part in the working class struggles in Liverpool, Jim Arnison, Union of Construction, Allies Trades and Technicians (UCATT), London, 1980, 118 pages.

50 Years On ‘Remember Birkenhead’ – 1932 The Unemployed Strike Back, Merseyside Socialist Research Group, Liverpool, 1982, 24 pages.

Campaigning for Jobs and Services, Liverpool – a Socialist Council, Liverpool’s Budget Crisis 1984: the story of the campaign, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool, 1984, 35 pages. Includes broadsheets and leaflets produced at the time of the campaign. Under the name of the city council but a document produced by the Trotskyite  ‘Militant Tendency’.

Liverpool – a city that dared to fight, Peter Taaffe and Tony Mulhearn, Socialist Party – formally Militant, digital version, n.d., 504 pages. A book by Trotskyites and about the Trotskyite ‘leadership’ of Liverpool City Council in the 1980s. Included here as whatever the ‘leadership’ or the outcome the conflict between local and national government is part of Liverpool’s history and the fight demonstrates one of the few occasions when there was a concerted struggle against Thatcherite policies.

Labour Research Department (LRD)

Wages, Prices and Profits, Preface by Sidney Webb, LRD, London, November 1921, 110 pages.

Printers, Press and Profits, W Fox, Labour Research Department, London, 1933, 30 pages.

The Case Against Beeching, Foreword by SF Greene, General Secretary of the National Union of Railwaymen (NUR), LRD, London, 1963, 16 pages.

Privatisation, Who Loses, Who Profits, LRD, London, 1983, 55 pages.

The Miners’ Case, LRD, London, 1984, 24 pages.

Privatisation – the great sellout, Labour Research Department, London, February 1985, 44 pages.

Women’s Pay, Claiming Equal Value, LRD, London, 1986, 41 pages.

Racism in Britain

Black Voice, Popular Paper of Black Unity and Freedom Party, Volume 1 No 2, Black Unity and Freedom Party, London, 1970, 12 pages.

Old Chancellors cast long shadows, Lord Salisbury, Liverpool University and Racialism – a report, Liverpool University Guild of Undergraduates, Liverpool, 1970, 20 pages.

Paper Tiger (Red Mole), October 1970, 8 pages. [A Trotskyite pamphlet but gives an idea of the anti-apartheid movement in Britain in the 1970s.]

Anarchism

On Law, William Godwin, Freedom Press, London, 1945, 16 pages.

About Anarchism, Nicolas Walter, Freedom Press, London, 1980, 32 pages.

Solidarity

A ‘libertarian socialist’ grouping that was formed in the early 1960s and which last until about 1992.

Capitalism and Class Consciousness, Solidarity (Glasgow), Pamphlet No 3, 1970, 30 pages.

Labour Government vs The Dockers 1945-1951, Solidarity, London, Pamphlet No 19, 1970?, 20 pages.

The Commune, Solidarity Pamphlet No 35, Solidarity, London, 1971, 14 pages.

Strategy for Industrial Struggle, Mark Fore, Solidarity Pamphlet No 37, Solidarity, London, 1972, 32 pages.

Under New Management? The Fisher Bendix occupation, Solidarity Pamphlet No 39, 1972, 16 pages.

Science

British Society for Social Responsibility in Science Manifesto, BSSSR, London, 1970, 12 pages.

More on Britain …

View of the world

Ukraine – what you’re not told